Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research
Find out more about what we do and who we are.Read executive summaries of our papers, press releases about our activities, and see a listing of water and agricultural legislation and regulation.View the projects our scientists are currently conducting.Look up research publications and journal articles written by our staff.
TIAER home Site Map Tarleton State University Texas A&M Univ. Systems Conact Us TIAER home
 TIAER >> Inside TIAER >> From the Director
 
 
 
 
 
 


PIMA Demonstrated in Microwatershed

Ron Jones, director of TIAER
Over a span of five years, the 3,652 acre Goose Branch microwatershed in north central Texas provided TIAER with an opportunity to demonstrate the viability of its Planned Intervention Microwatershed Approach, a new model for addressing agricultural nonpoint source water pollution. With eight dairy producers and approximately 4,800 cows, Goose Branch was selected because of its intense dairy use.

TIAER defines a microwatershed as an area within a watershed, incorporating anywhere from 3,000 to 20,000 acres, with identifiable hydrologic boundaries. By dealing with this smaller area, project coordinators can reduce land-use variables and more readily identify pollutant load contributors.

I believe the microwatershed approach can be an effective method for addressing Clean Water Act issues. Among other things, the microwatershed approach:

  • Copes with complexities inherent in watersheds. By dividing large watersheds into small microwatersheds, policy makers can better understand the complex interactions that occur in natural systems.
  • Exerts positive peer pressure. In Goose Branch, seven of eight dairy producers were persuaded to participate in the microwatershed project. The lone dairy owner who chose not to participate lived in Arizona, which made him immune from peer pressure.
  • Encourages producer acceptance of water quality problems. In a microwatershed, a producer is more likely to recognize the potential water quality impacts of his or her operation, and will more readily understand his or her role in water quality protection.
  • Allows for the establishment of a microwatershed producer council. In Goose Branch, producer council members received information regarding phosphorus loadings, feasibility of composting strategies, fertilizer application, and soil test results.

While most producers in Goose Branch made progress in their nutrient management, they also fell short of the level of management needed to bring elevated nutrients down to acceptable levels. Voluntary programs alone without incentives beyond traditional programs will not likely produce the desired results. In the final analysis, the project demonstrated the height of the mountain to be climbed by agriculture, as the industry moves to address the water quality concerns of an increasingly unforgiving urban society.

 
     

2002 Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research